FARHAD ALI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN POST OFFICE
Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The Penal Amendment Service Tribunal and the Supreme Court jurisdictional employee were dismissed for misappropriating the public money entrusted to them, which was ordered by public servants. The service was maintained by the tribunal. In dealing with the appeal of any civil servant, in the exercise of his powers under section 5 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, his penalty may be changed to a lesser penalized service service tribunal, while sitting in the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court. Has the option to modify and edit the command. The appeal of the service tribunal can also be used to meet the dependence of justice on the appeal which depends on the facts and circumstances of each case when the applicant was held in a position where the responsibility was taken by the public. It deals with the money entrusted to him and such misconduct. The public money, however, cannot be taken lightly for a short period of time and neither can the government head be neglected, it was responsible for the consequences of its behavior, and the Supreme Court mandated the retirement penalty. I was allowed to appeal the change
