Sections 302, 392 and 34 of the Law Procedure (10 of 1984), Section 22 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Evidence Reviewed on the evidence recovery of the evidence evidence case was arrested in another case, Was sent to you Trial witnesses identified him during the identification parade; during the trial, the court last identified the accused as a witness, the identification of the parade and the identification card and the identity of the accused at the hotel. The sentence and sentence awarded by the pass book trial court were upheld by the High Court. The circumstantial evidence should be like a fine chain on which the accused should be identified at one end and the other as expected by the prosecution's witnesses, and evidence of the identification test was not credible. The only cause of death came from the attackers and did not take the cause of the assailants. The hotel staff was referred as a witness and no documentary evidence was collected on the evidence of the hotel being booked by the investigating officer, nor Only in this case was the statement of a hotel manager or staff member recorded that such behavior was unusual. ? Whoever took the precaution to conceal his guilt, will retain irrelevant evidence The High Court, knowing that the recovery evidence has no value, did not mention it in his decision under which the prosecution dismissed. Was punished, therefore, the sentence failed to prove his case against the accused. And the punishment given to the accused was set aside and the accused acquitted
