Find a Lawyer

SHAHTAJ SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus ADDL. SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, KARACHI

R11 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) imposing regulatory excise duty on the manufacture of sugar manufacturers without challenging the duty or absence of any protest and not claiming a refund within one year. Regulatory duty submission. Excite this claim after six years, and the equipment and waiver rules will also go against the manufacturer's rules.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Engineer IQBAL ZAFFAR JHAGRA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of Pakistan, Islam 2009 SCMR 1399
• FAIZ MUHAMMAD v. State 2009 SCMR 1403
• GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Land Acquisition Officer v. MUHAMMAD JUMAN 2009 SCMR 1407
• JAMIA MASJID QAZI ABDUL QADIR AND DARUL ALOOM HAQANIA QADRIA through Akama Ghulam Yahya Haqani v. JAN MUHAMMAD 2009 SCMR 1418
• Mst. RAZIA alias JIA v. State 2009 SCMR 1428
• ABDUL RASHID v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, POST OFFICES, ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 1435
• NAZIR SHEHZAD v. State 2009 SCMR 1440
• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN v. Mian NISAR ELAHI 2009 CLD 1442

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

female advocates from Khanbel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes