Section 302 (b) / 324/34 of the Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6/7 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Qatl-e-Imid and Qatil-M's terror and possession of arms. The evidence to the benefit of the doubt The fire shots received from the dead and wounded were from a high-speed firearm and not from a low-speed gun like a repeater, which was a shotgun for bird-hunting. That didn't give him time. It also sealed the possibility of litigation and the inclusion of another innocent person to evacuate any other cabalties, as the benefits of the offenses could be extended to two of the three accomplices as the opening of the firearms involved two partners. The suspects were far away, and their involvement could be the result of sectarian hatred, whereby the maximum number of other sectarians could be employed on the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 provided for crimes under Sec. There was a special law. On6 of the said Act would disregard the provisions of the common law because the special law schedule imposed murder whereby the offender could be sentenced to death, in the light of statements of the prosecution's witnesses, recovery, motive and trial. In other cases, the prosecution had proved the fact of the killing and four others injured, the prosecution presented evidence of prosecution against the accused under Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 Against the accused, his conviction and conviction were maintained and to that extent, positive response was given to the murder, Take advantage of important doubt
