COLLECTOR BALTISTAN (SKARDU) versus GHULAM SYEDAIN
Sections 4, 11, 18, 28, 34 and 54 Determination of Acquisition Compensation Amount of Reference to the Court Increasing the Amount of Compensation Interest payments to the landowners received the compensation amount under protest and the Land Acquisition Act Filed an objection petition under section 18. , 1894, which was referred to the court and the referee's court increased the rate of compensation as requested by the landlord. The referee court also leased the acquired stores and justified the increase in 10% simple interest payments in the commercial area and has potential in the future, but the same area created by the authority to present a modern award. The source has proved that the referee court rightly raised the rate of compensation under favorable conditions, which the authorities concerned objected, however, to a 10% simple interest grant and a grant of shoplifting grants on improved money. Was, the referee court in violation of section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and simple interest on the surplus amount 1 0% was fixed because it was stated that Section 28 provided interest on 8% surplus interest due to the objections to the shops, which was objectionable in the law as the special law provided for section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and Under 34, penalties were provided which allowed compound interest at the rate of 8% for the delay in payment of compensation, there was no beer on land occupancy, rent etc. / Land Acquisition for acquisition of any land. The appeal for land or shops recognized by a provision of the Act, 1894 was partially accepted by (a) the rent of the shops; The treatment given lsly
