In sections 9, 10, 18, 19, 24 and 32, the misconduct, corrupt and corrupt evidence of evidence was investigated in this case by a person who showed himself to be an investigating officer, However, they did not have the proper authority through Chairman NAB. Investigating the matter under section 18 (c) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the interference of the Federal Investigation Agency in this case was also a violation of Section 18 (d) of the Ordinance Regulation provided by section 18 of the National Accountability Ordinance. ? Compulsory in nature and the Chairman NAB was obliged to follow a special procedure to prosecute a person under the said ordinance, in the present case, provided for by section 18 (c) (d) (g) of the National Accountability Ordinance. Not only was the mandatory procedure taken, 1999 was violated, but Section 19 of the Ordinance was violated. Such violations were not merely technical, but were thorough investigations, investigations, evidence-checking in this case. Calling individuals to obtain information and report submitted under section 1773 of the Investigation Officer identified under CRPC The above conditions were disregarded in section 18 (c) (d) (e) without the above mentioned terms and without any legal authorization) (g) and section 19 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 was expressly and expressly violated. , Then the process of void investigation without the officer's authority became unlawful, illegal and under the jurisdiction under which the Chairman NAB granted Section 18. A) The trial was declared illegal by the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and the Accountability Court and this case
