Articles 302 (a) (b), 304, 306, 307 and 308 Qatil Ahmed's testimony by presenting the record, especially the statement of the prosecution's witness, had fully proved that the accused had killed the accused and registered external injuries. Had committed The medical legal report mentioned the bullet, the statement of the prosecutor's witness was fully confirmed, but the witness evidence on the record fully confirmed the story narrated by the prosecutor and related to the accused's guilt and guilt. There was no doubt, however, that he was a minor when he committed the crime, 12 years and 2 days. This fact was never challenged by the prosecution, in the circumstances, at the time of the commission of section 302 (b). Was completely trivial, the PPC said, because of the lack of evidence in any form specified in Section 304, PPC, RA will not cover the class. And the offender can be punished only under penalty of perjury under section 2302 (a), PPC, irrespective of the facts and circumstances of the case, but this will not include cases where the minor or the insane person Qatal was guilty of Um. The Legislature provided a special provision specifically under the title of Section 6306, PPC stated that the cases of minor were clearly removed from the scope of section 22 (a), PPC and The culprits for the offenders mentioned in Section 630, PPC, were not enforceable: Minor children, including Sections 306, 307 and 308, were charged with murder under PPC only section 302 (a), PPC. The cases were attracted, but not in the case of Qatil Amd, covered under the scope and definition of Sec. 302. b), the PPC filed a trial court.
