A VII, R 2, O IX, R 13 and O XLIII, R 1 (d) Suit for recovery of money In the present hearing, when the matter was settled for final order, the trial court hearing, He turned, without giving any reason, and resolved the matter again for argument, but a previous order was passed, which was set aside. Once again the case was adjourned for further proceedings and the unclear decree of the former party was passed, the date in which the ex parte decree was passed. For the case to be settled, the proper way was to decide on the qualification. And even when the matter was settled for argument again and the parties made a long excuse, the proper way was to give a verdict on the merit when the defendants were absent from the court. To decide the circumstances under the trial court, without the competence of the trial, the former party failed to exercise jurisdiction over the law by decree and the previous order was set aside and the case returned to court. Was made, so that a decision about eligibility could be made.
