O XLI, R 27 During the approval of the appeal against the judgment and injunction regarding the trial under preparation of additional evidence, the applicant brought a copy of the Gift Statement and the facts of the case to the record relating to 76 years of 1975. The petition for additional evidence was presented. The applicant merely submitted an exception to his request that he was aware of the gift when, after the decision of the trial court's explanation and the plea made by the applicant, it was not understandable and irrespective. Was because the gift in question was implemented on the 30th 1990 1990. However, the claim filed on 3 December 2005 that the public document was processed and secretly registered, cannot be said that the PCP, at the time of the evidence under O XLI, R. No explanation was offered. 27, a document may be submitted to the CPC or examined as additional evidence of any witness so that the court may be able to pass a verdict, but at the same time, the said law was forbidden. It was stated that the rule would apply only if additional evidence was required by the court when permission for additional evidence was arbitrary and could be used by the appellate court itself and not by any party. Appealing from within can be quite easy. The appellate court above found no need that in the absence of documents to be presented as additional evidence, he was unable to state that there was any good or good reason for the applicant to present additional evidence. Has not been made, the preparation of additional evidence
