CH. MUHAMMAD RASHEED versus CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR BOARD OF EDUCATION, MIRPUR
Section 44EWED Rules of Rules, R 32 (2) Registration Petition with R petition (R 32 (2) petition) prohibiting unauthorized ordering of employees who serve as Supervisor in the Board of Education The services rendered were dismissed. The appeal filed by the applicant against the employment disclaimer order was dismissed by the service tribunal could not be excluded from the validation file and a copy of the said order was not included with the writ petition. 2) In accordance with the Rules of Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court, the applicant was required to copy the defective order along with the writ petition notification, which was sought to be executed by the applicant, also in the application clause. The request challenging the order validation was not available, was filed after a period of 7 years and the notification was challenged after a period of 8 months. No satisfactory explanation. Such delay by the applicant. Submitted that the application of the bribery doctrine was fully applicable to the applicant's position was that the contentious Authorities were granted without providing an opportunity to be heard, the record of the case was not supported. The applicant was fully aware of the inquiry and had joined the inquiry made by the authority before discharging his duties and according to the relevant chapter of the calendar of applicant's powers of distribution against the applicant. The Impean Order was approved by a competent authority. He was acquitted of a criminal case against him
