AXXI, R 35, Sections 100 and 152 Implementation of the Decree The High Court in its decision directed the trial court that after the hearing of the appellant, a new order on the execution of the order could be issued on remand, ( Special) Appeal against the order of the seized trial court was also dismissed by the trial court, the circumstances did not comply with the High Court's remand order. The second appeal was subpoena and also the orders passed by the trial court. First Appellate Court Requires Amendment The High Court had jurisdiction to remove the subordinate court's wrongs. Initially, a decision for joint possession was passed in favor of the defendant, then proceeding An application for correction of the order was filed in section 152, CPC, although one of the measles numbers was deleted, but the nature of the decree was not altered and can be said without any imagination. That the trial court, while correcting the decree, passed a decree for possession, which was outside the scope of section 152, jointly The PC order for possession was to be brought into the process in the light of the provisions and I XXI. , R 35, CPC, under which the executive court's grant of a joint possession warrant should have been issued, as the execution court could not go before the appellate court's decision, accordingly, the warrant was amended accordingly. Is also needed. The court will be deemed to have been released for joint possession of the suit land and will be executed by the respondents in accordance with the provisions of OXXI, R 35, CPC.
