DR. ANWAR ALI SAHTO versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Arts 25 (a) and 199 Constitution Uniform Protection of Civil Service Laws The jurisdictional applicant succeeded in approving his reinstatement in a revision petition filed by him before the Supreme Court complaining that he was another Trainee engineer. The employer himself had absorbed one of the trainee engineers, therefore, treating all such employees equally, they were also instructed to serve with specific observation. Engage and a doctor was of the same class, therefore, the former was equally entitled to be imposed under Article 25 (a) of the Constitution. The protection of the law in respect of privileges and responsibilities granted by the applicant through the basic salary and employer was from the date of the decision of the Supreme Court but since the doctor was reinstated long ago, in the case of the applicant, Therefore, it received annual increments and other employment opportunities to remain in permanent service; therefore, to the extent that the physician and applicant's financial benefits could not be equated, in the circumstances the petition was rejected.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
