Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL MANAN versus STATE


The witnesses suspected of Section 9 (c) and 25 intoxicants were persistent on material points, and minor contradictions stated that it was not enough to discredit the statements of witnesses or to accuse them of any rivalry or misconduct against the witnesses of the complainant or the prosecutor. Not done. The defendants, who violated Section 103, CRP, C, have not carried any weight under Section 25 of the Narcotic Materials Act 1997, which specifically eliminated the section 103, CRPC Chemical Examination Report. Was positive in relation to the drugs recovered from the accused. Both prosecution witnesses contradicted that the defendants claimed ownership of the drug bag that the drugs were manufactured from the local market and it was suspected that the prosecution produced enough material to link the accused to the crime commission. Was. Appropriate decision not to seek interference Then, the appeal was dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Poonch lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.