Police Surgeon examined the applicant to determine the age of the accused and, on the request of the trial court, to request a short cancellation of the section 5 and 7 panel code (XLV of 1860), section 302 murder IM Judicial Court. Concluded that the accused is between 18 and 18. The certified applicant, aged 19 and under the certificate of Omar, did not challenge the search for a police surgeon. However, he re-filed in the Anti-Terrorism Court that he should be tried because of his minor, which was also dismissed before the Juvenile Court, accusing a person of establishing a minority. He made such a claim and it is up to the applicants that he has furnished all the evidence he has or that he has tried to rely on at this stage when he himself requested the minority at that time Could have produced a birth certificate and endorsed it through other evidence, but in the relevant time, Or the evidence was not presented and did not challenge the finding recorded in the Omar certificate issued by the police surgeon but it was only after more than 2 years that the attempt to aggravate his case. I was doing. In the present case, the applicant's nature was not examined on his own nature, nor did he choose to challenge the age certificate issued by the police surgeon nor to provide any evidence to support it. Including the birth certificate, which was submitted at a late stage, was accused of favoritism over the matter.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
