Find a Lawyer

MIRAN BALOUCH versus STATE

Sections 2626 & 56 and 1 561 of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), application for the suspension of a Section 9 (c) sentence has been a stroke since 2004 and since then has not seen any improvement in its condition I did not come because he could not walk. Neither doctors reported that the sit-in was being consulted permanently from the start of physiotherapy, but there was no such facility available in the prison. If such a situation was allowed to remain, it would prove to be very effective for the lives of the accused. And it doesn't work. After the trial was dismissed for suspension and bail, the accused was sentenced and ordered to be released on bail.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Dr. ANWAR ALI SAHTO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources 2010 PLC(CS) 446
• NELOFAR SOOMAR v. Mst. SHAHIDA 2010 CLC 447
• ABDUL MANAN v. State 2010 YLR 447
• MUHAMMAD WAHID v. ADNAN MEMON 2010 CLD 450
• RAJO KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 452
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 YLR 457
• INDUS POLYESTER COMPANY LTD. through Official Liquidator 2010 CLD 460
• Pir ABDUL AZIZ QURESHI v. WAPDA through Chairman 2010 PLC(CS) 461

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Jandanwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes