Section 489F & 420 Financial Institutions (Maintenance of Financing) Ordinance (XL VI of 2001), Section 2 (a) (c), 20 (4) and 7 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 561A and 249A An fraudulent check-and-fraud proceeding alleges that he is the chief executive of the lender's company and that it is responsible for completing its obligations and adjusting its dues, including mortgages for the unit / mill of the company. Demand and cash finance against various securities. Issued four post-dated checks, which were the manager of the bank and then they filed an FIR against the accused applicant under Section 489 F&420, PPC Trial Magistrate and the Sessions Court charged the accused under Section 249A. Denied the acquittal, the orders involved in the CRPC video were neither determined by the police, nor by the trial court admitting to the FIR and confessing to its jurisdiction. And the challan case was managed by the Financial Institute. The iTunes (Recover If Finance) Ordinance, 2001, which was a complete rule in relation to the transaction between the financial institution and the consumer, was defined by sections 2 (a) and (c), while the aforesaid ordinance Section 7 provided these powers, provided that the banking court subsection (4) of section 20 of the same ordinance provided for a financial institution where the check was fraudulently issued and in the account of section 7 of the said ordinance. He was also humiliated by inadequate balance. The case shall be filed by the bank user only under the above mandate by filing a direct complaint of any offense contained in section 20, as
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
