Sections 12 and 27 (b) Transfer of Property Act (IV 1882), Section 573 for the consideration of a specific performance of a contract to sell a planter for a dwarf fender buyer without notice, application performance, limitation application date On the basis of an agreement to sell, on 4 10 1982, the plaintiff seized the entire land after paying some money but the owner of the suit land then sold it in favor of the defendants in the years 1984, 1986 and 1990. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff in 1993, which was rejected by the trial court and the appeals were dismissed by the lower appellate court. There were. The petition submitted by the defendants was that the case filed by the defendant was withheld. The legality law did not enable a person to transfer the right to a property that he did not own, since the underground land was already sold under the contract to the plaintiff in favor of the seller. Had been contracted and linked to a possible transfer. Subject, therefore, its subsequent conversion to the disputed land could not be awarded for any legitimate title, nor could the latter claim to be an excessive purchaser of the value of the notice without transfer, when the land under question was transferred to him. Was made, the claimant was already present and the subsequent transfer did not contact the claimant to ask him about the nature or basis of his possession, therefore, the transfer was legal thereafter. There was no valid transfer, which was made under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1879. Section 53A of the Transferred Property Act, 1882
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
