MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-IIND (EAST), KARACHI
Section & Section Section and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for recovery of effect of admission articles filed by the plaintiff filed for recovery of articles of value of Rs. Articles and jewelry items also have value. Rs 1,20,000 was mentioned in the list of dowry articles. The plaintiff claimed on the basis that the plaintiff came to his house with his wife, brother and a servant and took all the household goods. Was gone as alleged by the trial court. The plaintiff's claim was dismissed that defendant's signature was not shown in the list of articles of dowry, stating that the appellate court had received an article by the appellate court which had been partially accepted and the peaks, To the extent that furniture, washing machines were recovered, this case was allowed. A review of the correctness of Rs. 1,00,000 in the refrigerator or its replacement was accepted by the plaintiff receiving the articles of dowry; therefore, the absence of signature was not concluded, so the plaintiff's counsel's statement that the peaks Etc. He is still lying with the defendant. He was unauthorized when the defendant appeared as a witness. The plaintiff also did not dispute the appellate court's finding of costs. Jewelry items High Court refuses to interfere with constitutional jurisdiction Constitutional petition dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
