The evidence brought on the record of the testimony of Section 3 evidence has finally proved that the complainant was the legitimate owner of the underlying plot and without any legal authority, the accused admitted his possession in the absence of the complainant. The plot, which was in the constructive possession of the complainant, was the pendency of the civil suit in the case of unlawful liquidation, under which no question was allowed in the statements of the accused under Section 234 Cr, CR PC. The prosecution was merely an irregularity, which did not result in any misunderstanding of justice and consequently the conviction of the accused was maintained, however, the casualty was from a naked conspiracy and not from the house, the accused no Was not a professional land grabber and was not involved in any such ex-offender. The appeal was dealt with under the 10-year sentence for the activity and a fine of Rs 50,000 for the accused, reduced to three years \ RI and a fine of Rs 10,000 respectively. r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
