MUHAMMAD ALI versus IVTH ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD
Offerings, Sections 3 and 5 of the Unlawful Settlement Act of 2005, the scope of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 could not be limited to only those who were former occupants of the land or former occupants of the Qibla Group or Land Mafia. Were. Illegally excluded, he belonged to the Land Robbers, the Qibla Group or the Land Mafia Group, so that proceedings could be maintained under the Illegal Settlement Act 2005, thus the intention of the Legislators could not be, Section 3 of 2005 was designated. , Every act of homelessness undertaken by a person is clearly included, irrespective of whether he or she has worked individually or with other people. It was also not necessary that the accused, who committed the illegal act of eviction, should already be known as a land grabber or a member of the occupation group or the land mafia. In their defense, the respondents claimed that they did not occupy any part of the underground land, and it was claimed that the area belonging to the irrigation department was their only possession, such In order to resolve rival claims it was necessary that the revenue record should be before the trial court for its inspection. Question Whether any part of the survey number was captured or intercepted by the respondents. And if the answer was in the affirmative, then the crime must be confessed because it was a matter of annihilation, the present case. Both lawyers had agreed on the legal position. , The unclean order was set aside and the trial will be held in the trial court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
