Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Application for default emission withdrawal in payment of rent The removal request on the basis of default in payment of rent to the tenant to the tenant. Emptying was allowed with instructions. The appellate court began, on the basis of a rent control agreement, a tenant agreement, which was executed between the parties, after which the appellate court gave the landlord within sixty days. Handed over his empty possession. His lawyer, however, responded that he later refused to enforce the rent agreement during the proceedings. And claimed that the tenant had occupied the premises before 1985, after which there was a matter of consideration and this request was made only by the tenant's default claim. The question was taken to avoid the fact that he paid the rent. The dispute, however, failed to meet its burden, the tenant admitted that it was neither reported to the landlord nor his lawyer told anyone to pay the rent, but when he When he started collecting rent in court, he started collecting it as per his admission. Even for the unrelated persons who were entitled to pay the rent / tendering of the land through the tenant order through the tenant controller, the circumstances of the case were quite legal and appropriate and as a result of the misrepresentation of the evidence, Was isolated. The appellate court ruled that the law of martyrdom, 1984, violates the principles of appellate court and the result of misrepresentation of evidence
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
