GHAZI NASEEM versus MOULANA MUHAMMAD BILAL SOMAYRI
Specific performance of the final outcome of the agreement and the plaintiffs filed by the plaintiffs under the agents interested in the Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 202 Agency Effect Suite Appeal dismissed from trial. On the basis of the validity of the limitation, the court and the appellate court, respectively, did not have any of the ideas as envisaged in Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908. What, considering the sale, the collection of the entire amount, since 1996 the unauthorized permanent occupation of the original documents of the suit property and title, as well as in the agency meter with the authority of the registered Atal General Sub Power of Attorney. There was no interest, no contenders. In order to exercise the jurisdiction of the appeal, the judgment should be set aside in addition to the plaintiff's High Court and the ND decree was passed by the two courts below and decided to prosecute in favor of the plaintiffs. r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
