The filing of the final report by the Investigation Officer for cancellation of the case under Sections 173, 190 and 561c provides for the availability of sufficient evidence on record to link the accused to the crime by dissent from such report. However, the investigating officer was instructed to submit a report accordingly. After filing such a report, the magistrate also had the authority to disagree or disagree, but in the event of disagreement, he could order further investigation by the police, and In such a case, when no investigation is needed, he can admit it. According to the provisions of Section 190, the PC Magistrate did not have the authority or authority to instruct the Police Investigation Officer to file any other report under Section 173, CCPC, by which he disagreed. The High Court set aside the defamation order and directed the magistrate to give proper passage. Orders on such report as required by law
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
