Ordinance of Section 3 Companies (XLVII of 1984), Sections 290, 233 and 305 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 The interim order of the Investigating Auditor from the court is directed to the reporters not to hold a general body meeting without its explicit order. To do Annual report by the company to its shareholders and stock exchanges preventing the company from publicizing such pending proceedings; the company's case is strong in this case, and there is every possibility that the applicant Will not be entitled to it. Respondents of the petition for discrimination petition had rendered a decisive decision before publishing such report, which would interfere with the pursuit of justice, disobey or neglect or approve such a restraining order. In the complete violation of a legitimate action given to the High Court during the High Court, no action was published. The client's counsel cannot be termed as prejudicial. The respondents had such feedback / suggestions. Some special and definitive respondents did not hire the country's most senior lawyer in this petition and are expected to give their opinion / advice on the possibility of success or defeat in a strong case or in any case. , Which mandates such restriction. Approved, already dismissed, the issuance of such a report required section 233 of the Companies Ordinance 1984, and the listing regulations of the Stock Exchange High Court dismissed the contempt petition in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
