SYEDA FARHAT JAHAN versus SYED IQBAL HUSSAIN RIZVI
Section 5, Schedule Section 17A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Suit for rehabilitation of minor children Transitional care of minor family children Transitional care according to the request of the parent to restore her original position According to the request for payment of, the family court dismissed such request that the minor was not eligible for rehabilitation for the period during which the suit was dismissed; Or otherwise, even stand up to its original status, restitution arrears after suit restored after family court. The payment of was ordered as it is ordered that the right of rehabilitation is the natural right of the minor children, therefore, the father may not be allowed. In any case, neglecting the same legal and moral duty of fat was to continue caring for the minor children as their natural guardian if any negligence or neglect by the father was encountered. If the court is brought to his notice, the court must order the care and no excuse, big or small, can dispel the father of his underage children. The right to care for minors, even though a limited one, is the duty of care which was assigned to them by the Divine Revelation of Allah. For the time being, the Act of the Court was in jeopardy, which could not be allowed to be maintained. In any case, the High Court, rejecting the unconstitutional order, directed the father to submit the arrears of interim recovery within 15 days.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
