Article 42 The sole legal heir to the declaration Scope The plaintiff sued to declare that he was the sole legal heir of his deceased father and was exclusively entitled to inherit the disputed property and that the defendant As a adoptive daughter, the plaintiff's real sister died on her way to Pakistan at independence, was not a legal heir and was not entitled to share in the disputed property and filed against the trial judgment and order. The court dismissed the trial of the plaintiff's appeal. The trial court was also dismissed by the appellate court, with the parent defendant making a statement to the Revenue authorities in 1989, when it was alleged that the altercation confirmed that his sister B-section B6 had died six months earlier and He is the sole legal heir of his father. Plaintiff testified that the plaintiff's father's name was mentioned as MY / Father's, and that the plaintiff, who contributed to his failure to exclude the position of evidence placed on him, was the plaintiff. Failure to prove that he was the sole legal heir of the MW and the defendant's mother was not the actual daughter of the MWE Elighed Affidavit was never proved by the parties and had no significant value. The height of the standard of proof was required to deprive a person of his or her rights in the inheritance property, especially where such rights were not explicitly obtained. Was unable to disclose or misread evidence, nor was there any illegal or material misconduct by the lower courts.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
