DR. GHAZANFFARULLAH versus SECRETARY HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 9 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 constitutional petition were challenged by the Civil Service Transfer Petitioners under which they were requested to transfer. There was no alternative treatment because once he filed a representation before the competent authority under the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, he had to wait 90 days before filing an appeal. That they were left `` healthy for 90 days and that was the period when the constitutional petition could be validated. Article 199 199 of the Constitution was subjected to the Constitution, while Article 121212 would prevail over Article 99 because of non-Constitution Article. It has been stated that "no court shall subpoena the order, neither issue any order nor take any action in connection with the matter in which the jurisdiction of such administrative court or tribunal has been extended" The High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain such matters under which sanctions were imposed. Counsel for the applicants under Article 1212 of the Constitution advised that they were careful after filing their representation under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, to register the representation without any departmental authority, under it The measures were initiated under section 4 (1) (a) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, the maximum representation limit was a part of the procedure / procurement for a 90-day period for a civil servant, which resulted in this appeal. It was a right to file that as a representative before the Department Authority, it cannot be taken to mean that the applicants will be excluded. That was it. Indeed, actually
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
