Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT KHAN versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN

Sections 2 (d) and 5 Intellectual Property Rights The plaintiff filed a lawsuit challenging the sale of immovable property, which affected her premature rights and promptly granted the plaintiff's motion for dismissal of the evidence. Claimed to perform as. The parties also dismissed the appellate court. Illegal variation was examined in the presence of the plaintiff's wife, which was discussed on the same day along with another mutation for sale. On the same day as it was affirmed, therefore, his claim could not be accepted on any other date as to the specific facts of acquisition and the circumstances of the case that the High Court sought to interfere with the findings of the trial court and the appellate court. Refused.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ZAFAR IQBAL v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, LAHORE 2010 PCrLJ 40
• ALLAH DITTA v. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD 2010 CLC 41
• MUBARIK ALI FAROOQI v. CIRCLE OFFICER, POLICE STATION ANTI-CORRUPTION, FAISALABAD 2010 PLD 42
• Mst. MUHAMMAD JAN v. DISTRICT JUDGE, ATTOCK 2010 MLD 42
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. Haji MEHMOOD-UL-HASSAN through Special Attorney 2010 MLD 45
• PERVAIZ IQBAL v. RIFFAT BIBI alias RAZIA 2010 YLR 47
• PEGGY COLLIN v. MUHAMMAD ISHFAQUE MALIK 2010 PLD 48
• BASHIR AHMED v. HANIFAN BIBI 2010 CLC 50

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best advocate from Chaininda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes