Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VEHARI versus MESSRS BUREWALA COTTON COMPANY, BUREWALA THROUGH MUHAMMAD AYUB

In the 42nd Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), the trial court revoked the scope for the declaration filed by the plaintiff under Section 115, and the trial court upheld the verdict, and the petitioners preferred the appeal before the appellate court. The decisions and orders that were dismissed revealed that the two courts concluded that they were ambitious and for good reasons. Its review jurisdiction is guaranteed by the High Court

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ABDUL GHANI v. MUHAMMAD MAALIK 2010 YLR 422
• KHIZAR HAYAT v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KABIRWALA 2010 PLD 422
• MUHAMMAD AMJAD v. AZRA BIBI 2010 YLR 423
• HAMMAD ABBASI v. SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL ADYALA JAIL, RAWALPINDI 2010 PLD 428
• MUHAMMAD SULTAN v. ABDUL WAHID 2010 MLD 430
• NAEEM MASIH v. State 2010 YLR 431
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. ZAKA-ULLAH 2010 MLD 434
• COOL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Manager v. SHAFIQUE AHMED 2010 MLD 435

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

how to become a advocate from Ambela lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes