HAMMAD ABBASI versus SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL ADYALA JAIL, RAWALPINDI
Section 401 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a), 7 (d), 21 1 21F Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/149 and 148 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 9, 25 and 199 Remarks on Terrorism Measures, Assistance and Elimination, Assassination, Murder Weapons Constitutional Remarks, The accused's grant was sentenced under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and jail authorities under Section 21 All kinds of waivers were denied. Article 25 of Article 25 of the Constitution provided that all citizens living in Pakistan were equal before the law and were entitled to equal protection of the law, that is, all persons subject to the law should be treated equally in all circumstances and circumstances. Should be treated equally. , In both the privileges granted and the obligations imposed. It should be equal, which should be the equation between those placed in the same situation. Similarly, under any law there should be a set of rules for each offender and that the procedure and procedure of trial may be different. And there can be penalties. Laws may be tougher than other laws, but after sentencing, the offender must follow the prison rules, not in the present case, the anti-terrorism court had convicted and sentenced. Special and general amnesty was not granted under the prison manual The purpose of the amnesty was to reform the prisoner so that the purpose of his earlier release would be to improve himself, which would be a good indication for the prisoners and the community, and the denial of amnesty. Offenders under the Terrorism Act, 1997, and also those convicted by the provincial government under anti-corruption laws.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
