Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXXXX, Rr 1, 2 and Section 115 suit for the declaration and permanent injunction have been filed in connection with the suit in favor of the defendant in the suit deed filed Was questioned on which the grant was also filed, demanding that the temporary injunction prevent the plaintiff from interfering with the plaintiff's possession or denying the same trial court that the application was filed earlier In which the defendant stated that he would have no objection, if the defendant had been approved to the extent of any ownership. The defendant's possession was prevented from interfering with the plaintiff's contention that the appellate court's disputed order was the result of fraud and misrepresentation because the plaintiff purchased the suit house from the plaintiff registered by the plaintiff. Defendant filed the documents after the institution of the suit, but did not do so as to take any action to impose himself as a party, the plaintiff's lawyer acknowledged that the defendant had taken possession of the suit house. I was in the impedance order cannot be interfered with as the claimant will be bound to the matter which results in the transfer of the transfer landed light. The order was modified to the extent that the plaintiff was not expelled from the suit house, unless otherwise required by law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
