KHIZAR HAYAT versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KABIRWALA
High Court scope suit for the recovery of minor son and dowry articles in the jurisdiction of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 19 and Schedule of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 117, 118, 119 and 128. , The trial court ruled that the appellate court had rejected the appellate court's claim that the appellate court had granted a fine of Rs 30,000 each month as a substitute price for articles of suit fixing maintenance and dowry. A DNA test was not issued to determine the cause. The minor, and the courts below, allowed the plaintiff to enter and rely on the documents that would inform the defendant's birth and the information about the registration of his name in the defendant's court. Ali was not attached at the time of enrollment. Nasib, through Alepp Patwari, concluded that denying her son legal status was a tactic to avoid reinstatement. The plaintiff admitted that the plaintiff had divorced but on the birth of a minor one year before the divorce. Failure to prove false, the birth law during marriage was conclusive evidence of the validity of Article I28 of the martyrdom, which was not objection to the submission of the documents prepared by the plaintiff in 1984 as the plaintiff submitted a copy of the birth certificate Was. It was only after the defendant refused to recognize the minor as his son, or else, that the birth certificate was a public document assuming the truth, so there was no exception to the confession of the same directive. DNA tests can be taken as normal in cases where the father
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
