Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus AZRA BIBI

Recovery of Rs.100,000 by wife written in Section 17 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 5, Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Suite, The inscription is written in column 17 of the marriage contract. The effect is that if the applicant / husband married or contracted a second marriage, he would be liable to pay Rs. Was within the scope of the matter. The damages envisaged in Column No. 17 of the Agreement were not amendable to the jurisdiction of the Family Court, but can only be pursued before a civil court of ordinary jurisdiction, approved by the courts above. Decisions and orders were put aside.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ABDUL SATTAR v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2010 PLD 419
• Ch. ABDUL QADEER v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through the Secretary Cooperative 2010 MLD 421
• ABDUL GHANI v. MUHAMMAD MAALIK 2010 YLR 422
• KHIZAR HAYAT v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KABIRWALA 2010 PLD 422
• HAMMAD ABBASI v. SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL ADYALA JAIL, RAWALPINDI 2010 PLD 428
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector, Vehari v. Messrs BUREWALA COTTON COMPANY, BUREWALA through Muhammad Ayub 2010 CLC 429
• MUHAMMAD SULTAN v. ABDUL WAHID 2010 MLD 430
• NAEEM MASIH v. State 2010 YLR 431

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best law firms from Kotla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes