LAL KHAN versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION KOTWALI JHANG
CH XIV, [Sections 154 to 176] Section 90 (1) (b), 265 D, 265 K & 249 stand on these three pillars stating their powers of investigating the police and the scope of criminal justice system. In order to operate effectively and smoothly, the investigation; the prosecution; and the trial system, it is stated that the three pillars must be properly balanced in their respective allotted circle provisions in Chapter IV of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. Under, the police will investigate crimes that include spot inspections. Reviewing the facts and circumstances touching the crime under investigation; when sufficient evidence was available to support the indictment, the collection of evidence and the most complex principle of law was that the Investigation Officer was guilty or innocent of the accused. Is different from the public domain in case the investigator fails. In order to gather sufficient evidence to support the accusation / charge, he was required to produce a negative final report under section 173, read under section 173, and had to be presented to the area magistrate and there was no consensus or consensus. Was the area magistrate's case. Under Police Investigation Section 90 (1) (b), the CCPC trial court will admit the offense and not the offender. If the trial magistrate finds that there is sufficient evidence against the accused, he is entitled to conduct his own investigation in this matter. If the evidence against the accused was sufficient to produce a false / termination report, on the contrary, after the investigator submitted the invoice to the court, the prosecutor would be prosecuted by the state for the purpose of preparing the material to be used in defining the legal evidence. There was a need for the matter to be a trial court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
