Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Restitution allowance, constitutional application suit for collection of indoor money and expense allowance etc. The plaintiff filed a case of recovery allowance at the rate of Rs. 10,000, rate of Rs. 10,000, expenditure allowance of Rs. The Family Court upheld the suit up to the limit of restitution allowance at the rate of Rs. 10,000, dismissing the claim of the plaintiff on the amount of Dover amount of Rs. Court demands gold jewelry, Family Court remands Family Court on remand, Sue for Dover on remand, 000,,, 000,000 and other claims dismissed to the extent of the plaintiff. Reduction and recession The allowance was fixed at a rate of Rs 10,000 instead of Rs 10,000 which the Family Court ruled, however, the appellate court dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff, which did not allow the verification of the DOO evidence. In the constitutional jurisdiction, consolidated decisions passed by the two courts below for convincing, rational and strong reasons cannot be interfered with in the absence of any false statement and absence of evidence or permanent error on record. The constitutional application was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
