Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAH JAHAN KHAN versus FEDERAL SERVICE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE BENCH, LAHORE


The petitioner seeking equality with the constitutional application of Arts 199 and 25 has sought the authorities for a special judicial allowance for the verification record, which shows that similar High Court employees, Punjab Bar Councils The Office, the Attorney General of Pakistan, the Federal Tax Ombudsman and federal employees were receiving benefits to the Ombudsman, but the petitioner and his accomplices were being denied the same action by the authorities which violated Article 25 of the Constitution and was filed as a field petitioner. Could not be allowed to remain in the US and work in the Federal Service Tribunal's offices. One of those was entitled to relief. Claiming that the High Court directed the authorities to extend the benefit of the allowance to all applicants and all employees of the Federal Service Tribunal from the day the Attorney General of Pakistan's employees were granted the permission to apply under it. Given.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Shogram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.