Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SH. NAVEEDUR REHMAN versus STATE


Article 406 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 249A and 265K Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Criminal breach of trust exclusion of constitutional petition FIR could not be made while putting into question the factual facts. ? Extraordinary Constitutional Jurisdiction If an offense, if committed, should also be investigated and heard by the trial court, the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court was no substitute or additional jurisdiction for the accused. Under the trial court, there were multiple alternative remedies. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, under Section 249A, CRPC and 265, the constitutional petition for termination of the CCPRFIR was, therefore, not subject to the termination of the FIR in this case. Its use should be summarized in the usual method of law. Equal jurisdiction, which was not valid under the law, was excluded according to the constitutional application

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Daud Khel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.