CH. ABDUR REHMAN versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, F.I.A., FAISALABAD
Article 199 Constitution Petition Maintenance Petitioner filed an FIR and lodged a complaint against the respondents, who allegedly prepared a fraudulent revenue record and obtained a fake loan on a Bogus passbook for his private business. There were a number of alternatives, appropriate and effective treatments for it. The applicant, first of all, complies with the Banking Ombudsman under section 82 of the Ordinance of Banking Companies, 1962. Second, the filing of a complaint before the special court under the Orders of Ordinance, 1984 of the banks. Third, sections 22A and 22B, the deputy director under CRPC, seeking guidance against the FIA case, filing an application before Justice of Peace and the Fourth Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001 The lawsuit may be filed by the High Court for the registration or inquiry of the case under Article 199 of the Constitution, where alternative remedies were available. The confession is that this was the case before the banking court on the applicant's constitutional request. Was neither competent nor manageable, nor did he show the applicant's qualities in order to avoid paying off his debts so that he was trying to enforce it on the respondents. But no direction can be issued by the High Court to register the case in any case. The petition for the common constitutional jurisdiction was rejected accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
