Sections 12 and 27 (b) suit for the specific performance of a property sale agreement on the ground that the defendants had sold the disputed land to other persons in contravention of the sale agreement Defendants did not contest the case. And action was taken against them. However, new property buyers sued on the basis that the case was not intact because the defendants themselves acknowledged that their predecessor had obtained a permanent injunction against the defendants in interest and the existence of such an order. In particular, the specific performance trial was not a trial. The court ruled in the defendants' case, stating that the new buyers were entitled to reinstate their views with the defendants. The appellate court was granted an appeal filed by the defendants on the basis that the new purchasers were buyers without notice, justifying that the new buyers were aware of the sale and the plaintiffs in the interest of the plaintiff in the interest of the plaintiff were granted a permanent injunction It was directed that they do not interfere in the possession of the plaintiff and the defendants in the case, admitting that they have sold the land in question in the interest of the plaintiff and the sale process will take place. Action to be executed upon completion of immunity; such an order was not an obstacle to the establishment of a suit with specific performance, especially when the defendants in their first statement violated their statement and admission to the court. They allegedly sold a large part of the land to new buyers against the idea, so they had no option. Except for the plaintiffs who have a specific performance case in the circumstances, hi
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
