AXVII, R3 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), filed section 42 suit for a declaration against the plaintiff in advance of the interests of the defendant challenging the plaintiff's lawsuit and the death of the defendants. It was applied as a legal legacy when the plaintiff was instructed by the trial court to file the amended plaintiff's case, the modified plaintiff in the application filed under O XLVII, R 1 and section 151. The case was dismissed for non-submission of the petition, the CPC was allowed to apply for review of the dismissal order and the dismissal order was passed by the trial court. Was appointed by the appellate court, on appeal, the defendants dismissed the same suit filed on 21 7 2007, the plaintiff had the last chance to file a case for payment subject to payment and the same case on 15th 2007 Deferred. The adjourned date was on leave of the Presiding Officer and the case was adjourned to file the amended case on 24 9 2007. The court was on leave on 1592 007, ordering 217 2007, not in the field, because the next pending. As was the usual delay and no retaliatory action could be taken against the plaintiff, the postponement of the postponement at the request of the defendant could not be declared where the case was. The request of either party was not postponed; such party could not be reconciled with the conclusions which the High Court had rejected on the subsequent date.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
