Section 13 and 24 (1) (2) suit for premature occupation In the case of submission of the gold within the legal period, the plaintiff sued for pre-emption and objected that 1 / 3rd of the sale price was not submitted. The plaintiff, this case should be dismissed in accordance with the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, the trial court dismissed the case of the plaintiff = appellate court, on appeal, allowed it and decided the case. Separated. The court's claim by the defendants was that the plaintiff had submitted the sale of 19/200/2009 in 11 2005, which was delayed by 17 days. Judge Zar Sasim could be deposited 30 days later in 39 2005. When it was registered as a trial period. The 30-day calculation was to be made on the same date and not from 12 8 2005 when the file of the case was presented to the Duty Judge as it did not have a number in that date but submitted it to Zarim Shamim in 2005. had gone. 289 by plaintiff 005 was within a reasonable time. The High Court upheld the decision and order of the appellate court and directed the parties to appear before the trial court in the same date as the appellate court ordered in their judgment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
