MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB
R17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants, Recommendations of Revenue Options Standards Applicants were unhappy with the appointment of the respondent as a limber holder who acknowledged taxpayers. Accepting the recommendations, the appointee for the position was the best neutral government official who was the respondent's father previously a lambard in the strip, and as long as he had good discussions with the relevant government officials in revenue realization, ? They did not understand well with each other, could not properly perform the government's interest. It was considered before the authorities on the tax that the respondent belonged to the majority community, such as better harmony and good. In order to maintain the relationship, therefore, in keeping with the interest of the government and the link with the public, the defendants were appointed by the authorities to properly enforce the provisions of R17 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules 1968. , And Coda [was formally met, therefore, in the absence of any illegal, , The High Court refused to intervene) lmbrdar petition appointment as respondents in the case were dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
