Section 302/324/353/186/148/149/109 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Qadal Amad, attempt to AMD of murder and Terrorism Act is one of the definitions of FIR in this case. The unidentified statement was recorded that none of the delayed witnesses had excluded the witnesses, that they knew the suspects and that they saw them firing at the relevant time when the witnesses made their presence with the Inspector / Section HA only. To the extent that they received information that the suspects were present. The witnesses did not claim that the suspects in the house had actually fired at the police party, witnesses of the N-League had given statements. And in such cases it cannot be said that the prosecution was successful in prosecuting the accused through the Acular Account, the recovery of the weapons of the crime was legally unnecessary and unnecessary because no information from the forensic science laboratory on record No, whether the weapon was recovered. The suspects matched the blanks that were collected from the scene of the incident because of the weapons used by them during the incident, it was not proven that anyone was convicted of capital punishment. The evidence must be of high quality and good quality, which was not available in this case for the purpose of punishing the prosecution by bringing credible, convincing and integrated evidence against the accused beyond the scope of reasonable doubt. But in the present case, the evidence of the prosecution was not of such character to maintain the conviction. Of the accused who is against them
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
