Section 12 (2), A XXXII, R 1 & 3 Decision and Decree, Defending Defendant's Disclosure of Defendants The defendant sought to set aside the judgment and decree on the basis that at the time of filing the case, he was modest and Should be the claimant. The first validity as a guardian admits of the fact that the guardian was not prosecuted by the ad and this order would not be inappropriate and the guardian of the minor would be bound by the minor exclusion of the formal order of ad placement, Is represented by a natural guardian. Will not affect litigation, litigation, and litigation unless such prejudice is shown to be prejudicial to the slightest, otherwise such objection was merely a judgment of technical nature and this order was correct and Was legally sanctioned and there was no element of fraud or misrepresentation. It cannot be said that it was committed by fraud or misrepresentation as it was related to His Holiness the trial court acted in accordance with the law and according to this order there was no irregularity or illegal action. The High Court, therefore, refused to intervene in the same review
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
