Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Amad was the father of the deceased, appreciating the evidence, reducing the complaint, living in the same house near the incident. Other prosecution witnesses are also reported to have lived near the scene. Prior to the incident, it was natural that the attraction of the witnesses' presence at the scene of the incident was the presence of the complainant and the prosecutor's witness, in the circumstances, beyond the natural seat of injury and that such weapon was supported. The existence of enmity between the medical evidence parties was regularly mentioned when the incident occurred in the FIR, and the draftsman who planned the site also described the presence of electric light near the site of the incident. Otherwise the parties knew each other perfectly and there was no possibility of mistakenly identifying the complainant. The son was killed by the accused, it seems that this fat will not prove to be true and his enemies and real criminals will be included. Investigators collected large amounts of empty space from the spot inspection's presence, and 303 rifle blanks, along with the rifle recovered from the suspect, were recovered from the suspect and a positive report came out. The forensic science laboratory was also a factor that went against the accused. All such things showed that it was the accused who perpetrated the murder of the accused prosecutors but had long been subjected to cross-examination. Was gone, but their defense could not do any harm to them. The witnesses fired only one shot at the accused, which left the victim dead and the accused did not repeat. The same four co-accused were acquitted and in this case
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
