MUHAMMAD FAROOQ QURESHI versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SECTION 30
Section 496A and 380 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 157, 158, 161 and 173 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for Investigation of Police Case, Report of Police Request to be Canceled Cancellation Sections 161 and 164, in their statement under CR PC, the order was not approved by the magistrate in agreement with the magistrate as well as the report of the alleged abduction prepared by the police against the investigating officer. Someone has committed it with adultery. The police prepared a cancellation report and presented it to the magistrate, who disagreed with the report, and requested him to complete the invoice under section 173, CR PC and to investigate a criminal case and appear before the court. Gave orders which led to the police's conclusion. Under the domain of police and prejudice, the criminal or innocent disclosure of the accused, which has no other author, had no control of the fact, while agreeing to the report, the police had to file a challan against the accused magistrate. The journey beyond the jurisdiction to direct was not to leave the matter of arrest or challan of the accused or recording of evidence. The Investigation Agency will submit a report under section 173, CR PC, it will be open for the Investigation Officer to file his / her opinion about the crime or innocence of the accused in section 173, CR PC and if The investigating officer's final opinion was that the accused was guilty, then he would be able to release the invoice accordingly, to the extent that he directed the police to furnish the invoice without the authority and legal authority.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
