Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR KHAN BANGASH, INSPECTOR OF POLICE versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Arts 189 and 1991 Constitutional application Civil Service decides Supreme Court. The binding effect of the petitioner and the three others, in other cases, was directed by the service tribunal and the Supreme Court of Pakistan to instruct the authorities to decide their case, saying that the applicants' position was that their case was the case. Was equal. People whose appeals were decided by the service tribunal and the Supreme Court. And that they (the applicants) deserve the same treatment Article 189 of the Constitution has ruled that the decision of the Supreme Court is binding on every organ of the state and that they are bound to respect and respect the authorities. It was directed that if their case was found to be equal to those whose appeals were accepted by the Supreme Court, then the matter of the applicants and benefiting them.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• M. PARNIAN AROOJ v. MEHMOOD SADIQ 2010 CLC 258
• WATEEN TELECOM (PRIVATE) LTD. v. P. T. A. 2010 PLD 260
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. PAIRA 2010 MLD 261
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ QURESHI v. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SECTION 30 2010 PCrLJ 261
• Mst. KALSOOM BIBI v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 PLD 265
• SOHAIB SHAUKAT v. LABOUR DEPARTMENT 2010 PLC 265
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. VICE-CHAIRMAN 2010 PLC(CS) 266
• Ch. GHULAM MUSTAFA v. Mst. RIZWANA SHAHEEN 2010 CLC 267

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocates from Washuk lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes