In the Arts 9, 14 and 199 constitutional petition, Scope Petitioners were denied employment on a contractual basis on a contract basis for a year, but their contracts were terminated only after eight months. Despite being an employee, no legal hearing was provided. Applicable expectations would meet the terms of the contract, especially after working for eight months and drawing up their pay for that period, the appointment of the applicants was for their livelihood and without any process they would have to pay them. Deprivation of income was upset by Article 9 of the Constitution, including the right to life and the right to livelihood. Applicants also secured Article 14 of the Constitution, which concerned the dignity of a person. The order passed by the authorities discouraged the dignity of the employees and turned them into a cheat, which could be removed without notice. And in the case of contractual employees, their dismissal, strictly in accordance with the terms set out in the appointment letter, violates their legitimate expectations and in violation of their dignity and salary, which was not valid under the Constitution. That is, the responsibility of public officials is to act fairly, fairly and illegally. According to the agreement, it is solely the duty of the employees to respect the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, without the possibility of a hearing against any person or without notice to him. The negative order cannot be passed. High Court rejects petitioner's termination order Was illegal and illegal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
