Find a Lawyer

M. PARNIAN AROOJ versus MEHMOOD SADIQ

Section 7 (1) Rule (R3 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)), Rule 3 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) under the West Pakistan Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961. The spouse regarding the failure of the Council will participate in the arbitration proceedings by the Union Council, despite notice that the husband's request to the Union Council for the issuance of the student's certificate is periodic to the expiration of the required period of the day. Subsequently, the demand for litigation before the Union Council was initiated by the wife through a constitutional petition by the Union Council Petitioner. Failure to provide any legal reason or justification for terminating such proceedings for participation in the arbitration proceedings or the Union Council should prevent the husband from issuing such certificate at the expiration of 90 days. The court dismissed the constitutional application in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• UNILEVER PAKISTAN FOODS LIMITED through Company Secretary v. CHAIRMAN, ENVIRONMENTAL TRIBUNAL, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE 2010 CLD 254
• Mst. PERVEEN HUSSAIN v. JUDGE, BANKING COURT 2010 PLC 255
• Mst. NUSRAT RAFI v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), FAISALABAD 2010 PLC(CS) 257
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2010 YLR 258
• WATEEN TELECOM (PRIVATE) LTD. v. P. T. A. 2010 PLD 260
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. PAIRA 2010 MLD 261
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ QURESHI v. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SECTION 30 2010 PCrLJ 261
• MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR KHAN BANGASH, INSPECTOR OF POLICE v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 PLC(CS) 264

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

law websites from Fizagat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes