Sections 302, 324, 337 A (i), (ii), 33 7 F (i) (ii), 337 L (ii), 460, 148, 149 and 109 of the Law of Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 22 Identification of testimonial evidence The requirements of the parade could not be identified at the scene, but their characteristics were presented. Nothing was recovered from the suspect during the investigation. In a written complaint, the complainant stated that they had animosity. And that's why the homicide was committed, but in his statement to the court he came up with the version that the accused robber came to complain and subjected the other witness to the prosecution's investigation. Was gone, Lee N According to the prosecution or defense can not be any harm. Their statements were exempt because they remained consistent with each other at the point that they were not specifically identified by the accused and they only noted their characteristics and statues under which no identity was paraded. Was gone At this point, along with the rules and orders of the High Court (Lahore), the virtual identity parade of the investigating officer and the Judicial Magistrate's defining principles was monitored in a very unprofessional and illegal manner, which was a gross violation. It did not bother to initiate any precautions to ensure that the identity of the accused was not erased. The Judicial Magistrate's report was silent on the question as to whether it had ensured that the dummies that matched the accused had any resemblance to the accused. Nothing was recorded on the basis of their color, height, or other body characteristics, based on which the witnesses identified the accused,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
